Delegation Dilemmas: Coalition Size, Electoral Risk, and Regulatory Governance in New Democracies
نویسندگان
چکیده
This article addresses the determinants of regulatory agency design in multipartycoalition governments. Previous research has mainly focused on U.S. institutions, producing context-specific findings. We found electoral uncertainty, government turnover, and coalition size to be key factors explaining the bureaucratic autonomy of 31 state regulatory agencies recently created at the subnational level in Brazil. The legislative support that chief executives enjoy only acquires explanatory power when it is interacted with government turnover. Because Brazilian governors have great ability to build oversized majority coalitions, coalition strength influences the governor’s strategy when the governor faces credible threats from rival elite groups.
منابع مشابه
Conservative Party Statecraft and the Politics of Coalition
This article aims to evaluate the strategic positioning and ideology of the Conservatives in Coalition, under the leadership of David Cameron. In so doing, it seeks to shed light on the key drivers of the party’s elite leadership strategy since entering government in 2010. The analysis is framed in terms of statecraft, namely the attempt to carve out elite control of the main fields of ‘high po...
متن کاملGovernance, Government, and the Search for New Provider Models
A central problem in designing effective models of provider governance in health systems has been to ensure an appropriate balance between the concerns of public sector and/or government decision-makers, on the one hand, and of non-governmental health services actors in civil society and private life, on the other. In tax-funded European health systems up to the 1980s, the state and other publi...
متن کاملIdeological Constraint and the Quality of Governance in New and Established Democracies
The effectiveness of electoral accountability as a mechanism of citizen control in democracies has in the past been judged unfavorably, owing to the apparently low capacity of voters to organize their political beliefs in consistent ways—a concept known as ideological constraint. This paper suggests that such concerns are misplaced. I demonstrate that even though the quality of governance in ne...
متن کاملCan Informed Voters Enforce Better Governance? Experiments in Low Income Democracies
This article evaluates a body of recent work which uses field and natural experiments to answer this question. A common finding in the literature is that voter behavior is malleable and that information about the political process and politician performance improves electoral accountability. Limited availability of information thus provides one explanation for the persistence of low quality pol...
متن کاملPresidentialism, Electoral Identifiability, and Budget Balances in Democratic Systems
This paper examines the impact of the form of government—–presidential or parliamentary—–on fiscal outcomes in democratic systems. Based on data for democracies in 98 countries between 1970 and 2002, it shows that the gross domestic product ratio of the central government budget balance is higher in presidential than in parliamentary democracies. It also shows that this impact is not due to the...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010